A Guide for School Counselors: Understanding Test Scores and Recommendations
Assessment reports can feel overwhelming—full of numbers, percentiles, and clinical terminology.
This guide breaks down what different sections mean, how to interpret scores, and how to extract actionable information to support students in your school.
Most psycho-educational assessment reports follow a similar structure:
What it is: Basic demographics and why the student was referred for assessment.
Why it matters: Sets the context. Understanding the referral question helps you see what the psychologist was trying to answer.
What it is: Family history, developmental milestones, medical history, prior assessments, academic history.
Why it matters: Provides context for understanding current difficulties. Look for patterns—e.g., speech delays may connect to current reading struggles.
What it is: How the student presented during testing—engagement, attention, frustration tolerance, etc.
Why it matters: Helps you understand test validity. If a student was highly anxious or uncooperative, scores may underestimate abilities.
What it is: The core of the report—scores from cognitive, academic, and social-emotional measures.
Why it matters: This is where diagnoses and learning profiles are identified. This section often contains the most jargon.
What it is: The psychologist's conclusion—does the student meet criteria for a specific learning disability, ADHD, autism, etc.?
Why it matters: This is where formal diagnoses are stated. Use this section to understand the student's clinical profile.
What it is: Suggested accommodations, interventions, and next steps.
Why it matters: This is the most actionable section for schools. It tells you what to do with the information.
Most assessment reports use standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
This means the "average" range is 85–115, and most people (68%) score within this range.
| Standard Score | Percentile Rank | Classification | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 130+ | 98th+ | Very Superior | Top 2% of population. Exceptionally strong ability in this area. |
| 120–129 | 91st–97th | Superior | Well above average. Significant strength. |
| 110–119 | 75th–90th | High Average | Above average. Mild strength. |
| 90–109 | 25th–74th | Average | Within normal range. No significant concerns or strengths. |
| 80–89 | 9th–24th | Low Average | Below average. Possible area of difficulty. |
| 70–79 | 2nd–8th | Borderline | Significantly below average. Likely requires support. |
| Below 70 | Below 2nd | Extremely Low | Very significant difficulty. Requires substantial intervention. |
A student might have an average overall IQ (e.g., 100) but show a significant split between verbal reasoning (120) and processing speed (80). These discrepancies matter more than the overall score because they reveal specific strengths and weaknesses.
Not all assessment reports are created equal. Here's when to ask for clarification or a second opinion:
What is the primary diagnosis or learning profile? (e.g., Specific Learning Disability in Reading, ADHD-Combined Type, Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1)
What does this student do well? Where do they struggle? This helps you leverage strengths to support weaknesses.
Which recommendations can be implemented immediately in the classroom? Which require formal accommodations or special education services?
Share relevant findings (with parental consent) with teachers, learning support staff, and parents. Translate clinical language into practical strategies.
Assessment is not a one-time event. Check in on whether recommended accommodations are working. If not, consult with the psychologist or refer for re-evaluation.
| What the Report Says | What It Means for the Classroom |
|---|---|
| "Significant weakness in processing speed (SS = 75)" | Student needs extra time for written work, tests, and tasks requiring quick information processing. Reduce timed assessments. |
| "Working memory deficits impact ability to follow multi-step instructions" | Break instructions into smaller chunks. Use visual aids. Check for understanding frequently. |
| "Phonological awareness deficits consistent with dyslexia" | Student struggles to decode words. Needs structured literacy intervention (e.g., Orton-Gillingham). Allow audiobooks and text-to-speech. |
| "Executive function challenges impair organizational skills" | Student needs explicit organizational support—checklists, planners, structured routines. Teach study skills explicitly. |
| "Social communication difficulties consistent with autism" | Student may miss social cues. Provide explicit social skills instruction. Be clear and literal with instructions. |
If something in the report is unclear, don't hesitate to reach out. Here are helpful questions: